<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is China&#8217;s military strength overstated?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://okavangochallenge.com/sustainability-report/is-chinas-military-strength-overstated/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://okavangochallenge.com/sustainability-report/is-chinas-military-strength-overstated</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 11:27:06 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: robert x</title>
		<link>http://okavangochallenge.com/sustainability-report/is-chinas-military-strength-overstated/comment-page-1#comment-3576</link>
		<dc:creator>robert x</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 09:37:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://okavangochallenge.com/sustainability-report/is-chinas-military-strength-overstated#comment-3576</guid>
		<description>Surely  the only measure that matters is  a nations ability to suffer attrition to its  armed forced.

China has a total population of 1.3 Billion people. which  is about 4 times has great as  the US. If a conventional war where to happen between  the US and china  then the americans would have to kill 5  Chinese for each american life lost which in face to face combat  might be difficult, The  only possible way in which a war of attrition  could be  won by the americans would be due  to its better superior military equipment (stealth bombers, and cruise missile Technologies).&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;References : &lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Surely  the only measure that matters is  a nations ability to suffer attrition to its  armed forced.</p>
<p>China has a total population of 1.3 Billion people. which  is about 4 times has great as  the US. If a conventional war where to happen between  the US and china  then the americans would have to kill 5  Chinese for each american life lost which in face to face combat  might be difficult, The  only possible way in which a war of attrition  could be  won by the americans would be due  to its better superior military equipment (stealth bombers, and cruise missile Technologies).<br /><b>References : </b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: USAFisnumber1</title>
		<link>http://okavangochallenge.com/sustainability-report/is-chinas-military-strength-overstated/comment-page-1#comment-3575</link>
		<dc:creator>USAFisnumber1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 09:19:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://okavangochallenge.com/sustainability-report/is-chinas-military-strength-overstated#comment-3575</guid>
		<description>They are working on their first aircraft carrier.    The USA is having problems maintaining its 11 carrier fleet.  

They are building ten new ships a year.  The USA is retiring 10 ships a year and only building 5.  The US Navy is smaller now than it was in 1917 with less than 300 ships.   If nothing changes,  China will have a bigger navy by 2020,  excluding carriers.   Many think that the Battleship was the ship of WW ONE,  the carrier was the ship of WW TWO and the submarine will be the ship of the next conflict.

They are making advanced fighters and other planes.  The USA on the other hand spent billions developing the B2 bomber,  only to make 20 and now has only 19.   It spent billions developing the F22 and has stopped production at less than 200.   And the same kind of cuts are already being talked about for the F35.   The USA is close to losing its pure numerical advantage and will soon lose its technological advantage.   

China is already challenging the US Navy at sea.  It is flying its planes very close to our,  causing at least one air to air crash with the result of a top secret spy plane landed on Chinese land,  giving them the ability to strip it down and look it over.   Their ships are also playing chicken with our ships.   They would not be doing that if they did not think they soon will be able to make us back down.   

The 20th century was the Century of the USA....it looks like the 21st Century will be the Century of China..

You did not think the USA would stay #1 forever did you?&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;References : &lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They are working on their first aircraft carrier.    The USA is having problems maintaining its 11 carrier fleet.  </p>
<p>They are building ten new ships a year.  The USA is retiring 10 ships a year and only building 5.  The US Navy is smaller now than it was in 1917 with less than 300 ships.   If nothing changes,  China will have a bigger navy by 2020,  excluding carriers.   Many think that the Battleship was the ship of WW ONE,  the carrier was the ship of WW TWO and the submarine will be the ship of the next conflict.</p>
<p>They are making advanced fighters and other planes.  The USA on the other hand spent billions developing the B2 bomber,  only to make 20 and now has only 19.   It spent billions developing the F22 and has stopped production at less than 200.   And the same kind of cuts are already being talked about for the F35.   The USA is close to losing its pure numerical advantage and will soon lose its technological advantage.   </p>
<p>China is already challenging the US Navy at sea.  It is flying its planes very close to our,  causing at least one air to air crash with the result of a top secret spy plane landed on Chinese land,  giving them the ability to strip it down and look it over.   Their ships are also playing chicken with our ships.   They would not be doing that if they did not think they soon will be able to make us back down.   </p>
<p>The 20th century was the Century of the USA&#8230;.it looks like the 21st Century will be the Century of China..</p>
<p>You did not think the USA would stay #1 forever did you?<br /><b>References : </b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: skillipedia.com H</title>
		<link>http://okavangochallenge.com/sustainability-report/is-chinas-military-strength-overstated/comment-page-1#comment-3574</link>
		<dc:creator>skillipedia.com H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 09:02:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://okavangochallenge.com/sustainability-report/is-chinas-military-strength-overstated#comment-3574</guid>
		<description>They are building  a 36km bridge between HongKong and the mainland. Whoever can do that can make  the most advanced weapons without the help of the West

In the UK , we hardly managed to build a wobbly few-meters bridge in London&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;References : &lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They are building  a 36km bridge between HongKong and the mainland. Whoever can do that can make  the most advanced weapons without the help of the West</p>
<p>In the UK , we hardly managed to build a wobbly few-meters bridge in London<br /><b>References : </b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vicky</title>
		<link>http://okavangochallenge.com/sustainability-report/is-chinas-military-strength-overstated/comment-page-1#comment-3573</link>
		<dc:creator>Vicky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 08:31:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://okavangochallenge.com/sustainability-report/is-chinas-military-strength-overstated#comment-3573</guid>
		<description>Shouldn't think so, I suspect most of their weapons have never been seen by the west&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;References : &lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shouldn&#8217;t think so, I suspect most of their weapons have never been seen by the west<br /><b>References : </b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stainless steven</title>
		<link>http://okavangochallenge.com/sustainability-report/is-chinas-military-strength-overstated/comment-page-1#comment-3572</link>
		<dc:creator>stainless steven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 08:19:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://okavangochallenge.com/sustainability-report/is-chinas-military-strength-overstated#comment-3572</guid>
		<description>Thank you for answering your question at length.&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;References : &lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for answering your question at length.<br /><b>References : </b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

